a teaching resource for scholars and educators
![[Teach311 + COVID-19] Collective](https://blogs.ntu.edu.sg/teach311/files/2020/04/Banner.jpg)
![BOOK: Tal-Haek [Getting Off of Nuclear]: Post-Fukushima and the Logic of Energy Transformation (Korean, 2011)](https://www.teach311.org/files/2012/01/ed8388ed95b5.jpg "BOOK: Tal-Haek [Getting Off of Nuclear]: Post-Fukushima and the Logic of Energy Transformation (Korean, 2011)")
Energy and Climate Policy Research Institute (South Korea) ed. 2011. Tal-Haek: Post-Fukushima wa Energy Jeonwhan Sidae-eui Nonri. 탈핵: 포스트 후쿠시마와 에너지 전환 시대의 논리 [Getting Off of Nuclear: Post-Fukushima and the Logic of Energy Transformation] Seoul: Imagine. The nuclear disaster at
Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47: 119-146. http://www.springerlink.com/content/y2738665782223l6/ By introducing the concept of “sociotechnical imaginaries,” this article examines and compares the historical differences
Kim, Seong-Jun. 2009. “Technology Transfer Behind a Diplomatic Struggle: Reappraisal of South Korea’s Nuclear Fuel Project in the 1970s.” Historia Scientiarum 19(2): 184-193. Seong-Jun Kim explores the Nuclear Fuel Project, a failed attempt by the government and scientists of South Korea
DiMoia, John. “Atoms for Sale? Cold War Institution-Building and the South Korean Atomic Energy Project, 1945-1965.” Technology and Culture 51 (2010): 589-618. DOI: 10.1353/tech.2010.0021 South Korea’s nuclear program has a dynamic history. It began with nuclear technology assistance from the